Do you have a computer science degree? Me neither. Up until a few weeks ago, however, everyone thought the now former Yahoo CEO Scott Thompson did.
Yes, I said former. Thompson was forced to step down as the head of the internet and search giant after it was found out he did not, as his résumé said, have a computer science degree. Only a few phone calls were needed to confirm the college listed on Thompson’s résumé hadn’t actually started offering such a computer science degree until a few years after he was supposed to have donned his robes and graduated.
Similar to how LinkedIn liars embellish their experience or skills on their online profiles, Thompson appears to have been a résumé rorter, and is now a high-profile warning of what can happen when one lies or seriously misrepresents themselves on their résumé.
The media love such beat ups, and so do we, the public. Whether it’s the case of a former Australian Federal Court judge fabricating his PhD, or the somewhat ironic case in 2007 where a chap used fake qualifications to obtain employment with the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations, there’s always going to be those who will compromise their integrity for the sake of getting a foothold on that next rung in the career ladder. Telling the story of how these individuals get sprung makes for good reading, viewing or listening, so it’s no wonder the media (and tabloid media in particular) jump on these stories.
The case of Scott Thompson is obviously a high-profile one, but there are of course degrees of misrepresentation. After all, we all want to maximise the impact of our résumé, and sometimes it’s a fine line to tread. There are whole businesses out there dedicated to sprucing up résumés to make them punchier and more likely to get through the gatekeeper. Very few of these businesses, however, would deliberately deceive by adding phony qualifications.
No, such businesses and individuals maximise the impact of résumés by using strong, active language, and by conveying skills and value in a concise and powerful style. The right way is by being honest, both about your strengths and, just as importantly, about your areas for development. The better companies out there know this, and reward honesty and frankness. As one old employer once told me, we hire for attitude; we train to retain.
A résumé is a sales document; your sales document. It’s meant to get you in the door to the interview where, it’s then hoped, your intellect, approachability and enthusiasm will do the rest.
The saying ‘fake it until you make it’ is a popular one, but it ignores the fact that faking skills, attributes and competencies in a professional environment is in fact very, very hard. In the case of Scott Thompson, it remains unclear why this phantom computer science degree was added. Maybe it was a vanity degree; maybe it was meant to reinforce his tech credentials as head of Yahoo. Heck, maybe it’s true and some headhunting firm did put it on his résumé to bolster his standing when he was climbing the corporate ladder over a decade ago. If this is indeed the case, however, Thompson should have had noticed it, and had it removed. But he didn’t.
Whatever reason it was doesn’t really matter now though; the result for Thompson is the same as what it would be for you or I — shame, humiliation, the loss of a job, and credibility. Just because Thompson presided over a billion dollar company doesn’t mean he isn’t hurting just as much as Joe Clockpuncher would were he to be booted from his design agency job for fudging his résumé. A fall from grace hits all of us hard.
Ultimately, your résumé only gets you so far. Once you’re on the job, you’re on the job, and smart employers (who are only getting smarter in this online age) quickly find out those who don’t live up to the résumé hype; that’s why so many people are ‘managed out’ of organisations.
What do you think about résumé rorting? How fine a line is it to tread between using strong language and misrepresenting your skills? How do you maximise the impact of your sales document?Back